How AI is Reshaping Commercial Insurance and Risk Assessment - with Sidharth Ojha of AXA XL
π― Summary
Podcast Episode Summary: How AI is Reshaping Commercial Insurance and Risk Assessment - with Sidharth Ojha of AXA XL
This 26-minute episode features Siddharth Ojha, Head of Process Automation in Data and AI at AXA XL, discussing the practical, structured application of AI and Machine Learning within the commercial insurance sector, moving beyond theoretical potential to tangible impact.
1. Focus Area: The primary focus is the application of AI/ML within large commercial insurance and reinsurance workflows (underwriting, claims, risk assessment). Key themes include overcoming organizational inertia, managing data quality, navigating regulatory complexity (especially concerning global compliance for commercial contracts), and establishing effective governance for scalable AI adoption.
2. Key Technical Insights:
- Low-Code/Packaged AI for Business Users: There is a strong push toward creating controlled, compliant, low-code environments (like advanced Copilot Studio equivalents) that allow non-technical business users (e.g., underwriters) to experiment with and build AI solutions directly, bypassing traditional, multi-layered SDLC handoffs.
- Breaking Down Traditional Silos: AI tools inherently break down the traditional separation between business requirements and technical development, enabling faster iteration and reducing the intelligence loss that occurs across layers (BA, Developer, Architect).
- Infrastructure vs. Foundational Readiness: Scaling AI is less about having the newest tech stack and more about having streamlined, consistent processes, clearly defined roles, and high data quality standards. Companies with fragmented processes struggle to scale, even with modern tools.
3. Business/Investment Angle:
- Risk Aversion and Document Processing as the Entry Point: Due to high regulatory sensitivity and risk aversion, initial AI adoption in insurance heavily favors back-office, clerical tasks like document processing, as these are perceived as safer testing grounds away from direct customer interaction.
- Regulatory Confidence Boost: The maturation of regulations, particularly the EU AI Act, provides necessary guardrails, reducing open questions about legality and risk, which in turn helps senior executives gain confidence for approving new AI projects.
- The Scaling Bottleneck: A significant business challenge is that 80-90% of AI initiatives stall between Proof-of-Concept (POC) and Minimum Viable Product (MVP) due to unforeseen scaling challenges, emphasizing the need for thorough ideation/testing upfront.
4. Notable Companies/People:
- Siddharth Ojha (AXA XL): Guest expert, providing an insiderβs view from a major global commercial insurer on implementation challenges and strategies.
- AXA XL: Global commercial insurance and reinsurance subsidiary of AXA, specializing in P&C and reinsurance for mid-sized and multinational companies.
- Microsoft/Google: Mentioned as key providers whose integrated cloud AI tools (like Copilot) lower the barrier to entry compared to building bespoke tools from scratch.
- Munich Re (Michael Berger): Referenced in the context of industry experts discussing the impact of the EU AI Act.
5. Future Implications:
- The industry is moving toward a model where business users drive AI innovation within secure, controlled environments, fundamentally changing the SDLC.
- The convergence of global AI regulations (led by the EU AI Act) will create a more predictable sandbox for insurers to operate in, potentially accelerating adoption across complex commercial lines.
- There is a risk of a dichotomy emerging between digitally native, agile smaller players and large legacy institutions, though the latterβs deep data reserves remain a significant asset if foundational governance is addressed.
6. Target Audience: This episode is highly valuable for Insurance Executives, Data & AI Leaders, Risk Management Professionals, and Technology Strategists within the BFSI sector, particularly those focused on operationalizing AI beyond basic productivity gains.
π’ Companies Mentioned
π¬ Key Insights
"while generative AI holds promise, most of the real value today is coming from targeted, explainable models that support underwriters and risk p"
"I think the answer is not something which people don't know. It is quite easy that if you have your foundational pieces working, which is you have your people who understand what they are doing, their roles and responsibilities are clearly defined, very streamlined processes. You have processes which are very clear in terms of this is the input, this is the output... They will be able to scale them much quicker compared to those companies where people roles are challenged, they still have processes which are very fragmented, they still have data quality which is not consistent."
"That's the thing that these AI tools, in my view, can break because they kind of break all those layers in between. You don't need a BA, or maybe a little bit of BA, yes, but you don't need too many developers, architects here. It's already a business user can go in, start prompting, they can create their own tools, they can try and test their own ideas."
"if we have an environment which is fully controlled, fully compliant, and it does not require me to be a coder or a data scientist to be able to go and create something from an AI perspective. That's something I'm looking to create in our own environment within AXA-XL at different places."
"One other good thing with the EU AI regulation act is that... it is more detailed, it is more comprehensive compared to all other AI regulations in some of the other areas outside of Europe, which kind of feels like if you are compliant with your EU AI regulations, then you should be compliant with most of other global requirements as well."
"I do agree that with the EU AI regulation act and some of these more defined regulations coming in, it makes it a little easier for us to work through our own governance as we go through the AI topics. It reduces some of the open questions that we had in the past, which is, is it allowed? Is it not allowed?"